Design Review 22-003
10 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2003042155
Lead Agency
City of Mammoth Lakes
Document Title
Design Review 22-003
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
7/15/2022
Document Description
Design Review 22-003 for the Parcel Affordable Housing Project (Project) consists of Phase 2 which includes infrastructure improvements and construction of four 3-story, and one 4-story residential building for a total of 148 rental units (146-147 deed restricted affordable housing units and 1-2 manager’s units). The project is proposed to be constructed and financed in two phases, Phase 2.1, 72 units and Phase 2.2 including the four 3-story buildings with 76 units. Parking for the development is provided within an understructure parking garage that accommodates 72 vehicles, as well as 44 tuck-under carport stalls and 105 surface parking spaces. The proposed project is applicable to the 4.8-acre northeast portion of the overall Parcel site.
Contact Information
Name
Gina Montecallo
Agency Name
Town of Mammoth Lakes
Job Title
Assistant Planner
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Mammoth Lakes
Counties
Mono
Regions
Citywide
Parcel #
2003042155; 2015052072
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Town Of Mammoth Lakes
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
County Clerk
Mono
Final Environmental Document Available at
https://www.townofmammothlakes.ca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/12259/CEQA-NOD---Parcel-DR-22-003
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes (Environmental Infill checklist)
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
No
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes