Sunridge East Projects
2 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2006119026
Lead Agency
City of Rancho Cordova
Document Title
Sunridge East Projects
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
6/12/2020
Document Description
On March 6, 2006 the City of Rancho Cordova City Council adopted the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Sunridge East Projects, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and approved the entitlement package for the projects, as describe in the project title above. As part of the adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the City took the following actions:
• Made findings that the Mitigated Negative Declaration had been prepared and completed in compliance with CEQA.
• Made findings that on the basis of the Mitigated Negative Declaration, comments received, and the whole record that there is no substantial evidence that the project will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment.
• Mitigation measures were made a condition of approval of this project.
• This project is not exempt from the Department of Fish and Game fee and will pay the $1,250.00 at the time of recordation of this Notice.
Contact Information
Name
William Campbell
Agency Name
City of Rancho Cordova
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Rancho Cordova
Counties
Sacramento
Other Location Info
The Sunridge East project sites are located within the approved Sunrise Douglas Community Plan and SunRidge Specific Plan (SDCP/SRSP) areas on the southeast corner of Douglas Road and the proposed Americanos Boulevard. The project sites are generally bounded by the future SunRidge Park development to the west, the North Douglas development to the north, vacant land to the east, and by the proposed Chrysanthy Boulevard to the south.
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
City of Rancho Cordova
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
N/A