24250 Pacific Coast Highway- CDP 23-001
12 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2008091155
Lead Agency
City of Malibu
Document Title
24250 Pacific Coast Highway- CDP 23-001
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
8/8/2024
Document Description
Coastal Development Permit No. 23-001 for the construction of a 12,500 square
foot in-ground permanent skatepark, 146 square foot two-stall restroom building, 36 stall parking lot, two bioretention basins, landscaping, crosswalk over Winter Mesa Drive, various skating equipment, fencing, and benches located on Lot 7 of the case (formerly Crummer) property in the Planned Development and Public Open Space Zoning Districts located at 24250 Pacific Coast Highway (City of Malibu)
Addendum No. 3 to the Final EIR prepared for the CDP analyzed whether the modifications to the project would result in any significant impacts or substantially increase the severity of the previously anticipated impacts and concluded that no significant impacts would occur and no increase in the severity of previously anticipated impacts would result. The coastal development permit was approved subject to conditions.
Contact Information
Name
Gail Duncan
Agency Name
City of Malibu
Job Title
Administrative Assistant
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Email
Location
Cities
Malibu
Counties
Los Angeles
Regions
Southern California
Parcel #
4458-018-907
Other Location Info
24250 Pacific Coast Highway
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
City of Malibu
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
County Clerk
Los Angeles
Final Environmental Document Available at
23825 Stuart Ranch Road, Malibu, California, 90265
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
No
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
No
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes