U.S. Court and U.S. Marshals Service Courtroom, Office, and Facility
2 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2013062054
Lead Agency
Humboldt County
Document Title
U.S. Court and U.S. Marshals Service Courtroom, Office, and Facility
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
8/14/2013
Present Land Use
Business Park (MB); Business Park (MB)/Airport Safety Rev (AP)/Alquist-Priolo Fault Haz (G)/Landscape & Design (L)/Qualified (Q)
Document Description
Construction of a building to house a U.S. Court and U.S. Marshals' Service courtroom, office, and facility at the Airport Business Park that include a courtroom, jail, and offices. The entire facility will be 23,505 sf in size and less than 25 feet in height. The project involves a Coastal Development Permit and a merger of two lots into one to allow construction of the facility and a Special Permit for an exception to the parking standards and to allow up to 60 persons per acre on the site pursuant to the Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan. The project is subject design and landscaping standards. A minor adjustment to the Development Plan is proposed to accommodate off-street parking within a portion of the side yard setback. The project includes the removal of 3,000 cubic yards of soil. The site is served by municipal water/wastewater.
Contact Information
Name
John Miller
Agency Name
Humboldt County
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Address
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Counties
Humboldt
Cross Streets
Boeing Avenue and Boeing Court
Zip
95519
Total Acres
2.25
Parcel #
511-461-025 & 511-461-26
State Highways
US 101
Railways
No
Airports
Arcata-Eureka
Schools
Mck ES & HS, DOv
Waterways
Norton Creek, Mad River
Township
7N
Range
1E
Section
30
Base
HB&M
Other Location Info
McKinleyville
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
County of Humboldt
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.