City of Roseville Dry Creek Greenway East Trail Project
10 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2013112042
Lead Agency
City of Roseville
Document Title
City of Roseville Dry Creek Greenway East Trail Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
12/19/2022
Document Description
The proposed project would be a paved, multi-use trail that would conform to the City of Roseville Design Standards (Section 13 Bikeways) and other provisions of the City of Roseville Construction Standards. A typical cross-section for the proposed trail would consist of a 10-foot wide paved trail with two-foot shoulders on each side (one composed of decomposed granite and one of aggregate base), for a total width of 14 feet. The trail may also include drainage swales on one or both shoulders, as needed. The proposed trail may be narrowed to an eight-foot wide paved section with one- or two-foot wide shoulders for access spurs and in “pinch-point” locations that have severe physical or environmental constraints. The narrower cross section would still support safe, two-way travel but would limit physical disturbance where design constraints prevent construction of the standard cross-section. The proposed trail may also be widened in areas where additional shoulder or trail width is desired to enhance comfort and safety of the various user types.
Contact Information
Name
Sara Gevorgyan
Agency Name
Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board
Job Title
Environmental Scientist
Contact Types
Responsible Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Roseville
Counties
Placer
Regions
Northern California
Other Location Info
Latitude: 38°42'31.75", and Longitude: -120°57'24.34"
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
County Clerk
Placer
Final Environmental Document Available at
https://ceqanet.opr.ca.gov/2013112042/2
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
Yes
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes