South Fork Eel River Bridge Seismic Retrofit Project, EA 01-0A110; Streambed Alteration Agreement No. EPIMS-HUM-13460-R1
4 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2018122019
Lead Agency
California Department of Transportation, District 1
(DOT)
Document Title
South Fork Eel River Bridge Seismic Retrofit Project, EA 01-0A110; Streambed Alteration Agreement No. EPIMS-HUM-13460-R1
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
8/4/2022
Document Description
The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) has executed Streambed Alteration Agreement number EPIMS-HUM-13460-R1, pursuant to section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code, to the project Applicant, Jen Buck, representing the California Department of Transportation. proposes to retrofit the South Fork Eel River Bridge (Bridge #04-0123) on U.S. Highway 101 to improve the structural integrity and extend the service life of the structure.
Contact Information
Name
Jennifer Olson
Agency Name
California Department of Fish & Wildlife
Job Title
Senior Environmental Scientist Specialist
Contact Types
Responsible Agency
Address
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Cities
Myers Flat
Counties
Humboldt
Regions
Northern California
Cross Streets
(U.S.) Highway 101, near Myers Flat Humboldt, between Post Miles 27.71 and 27.92
Parcel #
Caltrans Right of Way
State Highways
US 101
Waterways
South Fork Eel River watershed
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
California Department Of Fish & Wildlife
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
County Clerk
Humboldt
Final Environmental Document Available at
California Department of Transportation
1656 Union Street, Eureka, CA 95501
Contact: Jen Buck
Phone: (707) 441-5877
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
No
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No